Same axis, very different evidence
All three act on the growth hormone axis — CJC-1295 and tesamorelin as GHRH analogues, ipamorelin as a ghrelin-receptor agonist — and all three raise growth hormone and IGF-1 in humans. That is where the similarity ends. Tesamorelin was carried through two phase 3 trials to an FDA approval; CJC-1295 and ipamorelin were dropped by their developers before any outcome trial was completed, and survive today as "research" products.
What tesamorelin's approval does and doesn't say
The approval is for reduction of excess abdominal fat in HIV-infected patients with lipodystrophy. That population, that endpoint. Using tesamorelin for body composition in people without HIV, or for "anti-aging", is off-label, and the trials to support it are small or absent. It is also expensive and, per its label, needs IGF-1 monitoring.
The "CJC/ipa" stack
The combination is popular because GHRH analogues and GHRPs act synergistically on GH release in pharmacology studies. Synergy on a hormone level is not synergy on an outcome. There is no controlled trial of the combination for any clinical endpoint that we can find. The FDA placed both compounds in category 2 of its compounding interim policies in September 2023, citing possible immunogenicity. On the list current at 22 April 2026, ipamorelin acetate remains in category 2 under the 503B policy while the CJC-1295 nomination has been withdrawn — and neither is on the 503A bulks list, so neither can lawfully be compounded.